Measures may exist. Evidence may still be unreviewable.
A notice, watermark, detector, or editorial workflow does not automatically create a reviewer-ready record. Buyers and oversight teams still need to determine what was implemented, when it operated, who approved it, how it was tested, and which limitations remain.
AGICOMPLY does not certify Article 50 compliance. The Baseline establishes what evidence exists, how verified artifacts support the defined review context, where gaps remain, and what should be addressed next.
What the Article 50 review context may require.
Applicability depends on the organization’s role, system function, content type, deployment context, and applicable exceptions.
Human interaction disclosure
Notice wording, placement, timing, ownership, and version history for systems interacting directly with people.
Synthetic-content marking
Machine-readable marking specifications, provenance records, representative outputs, and documented technical limitations.
Detection and testing evidence
Detector evaluations, test protocols, sample results, acceptance criteria, and reviewer conclusions.
Publication and editorial records
Deepfake or public-interest content disclosures, editorial review, approval ownership, and publication records.
How evidence enters the Baseline.
The same five deliverables, configured for Article 50.
- Evidence InventoryNotices, marking specifications, test records, sample outputs, approvals, and limitations.
- Mapping SummaryHuman-verified relationships between supplied artifacts and the defined Article 50 review elements.
- Gap RegisterMissing, weak, stale, unattributed, or inaccessible evidence.
- Ordered Remediation PlanWhat to establish first so the package can survive reviewer examination.
- Chain-of-Custody StatementHashes, source, owner, collection date, version, verification action, and ledger range.
Turn transparency measures into a reviewable evidence package.
Fixed scope. One defined AI system and review context. No annual license required.