Mark Gomez, Founder
Mark leads company direction, product strategy, assurance methodology, customer discovery, and commercial delivery. Contractor specialists support application development and prospecting. Mark owns the company and remains directly accountable for the scope, boundaries, and quality of every AGICOMPLY engagement.
This page does not present Mark as a certification body, 3PAO, attorney, CPA firm, or federal authorizing official. AGICOMPLY prepares evidence for examination. It does not replace the independent judgment of the customer, assessor, procurement body, or authorizing official.
Review Mark Gomez on LinkedInThe problem was not another score.
Teams often have policies, logs, screenshots, questionnaires, model notes, and test reports. The difficult part is showing a reviewer which evidence supports which requirement, which version was used, what remains unresolved, and who accepted the conclusion.
AGICOMPLY was formed to close that reviewability gap. The method preserves source identity, framework-version context, human review decisions, assessment dates, limitations, and chain-of-custody properties in a bounded evidence package.
Judge the work before the history.
- A completed illustrative evidence package is public and clearly labeled as demonstration data.
- A browser-based verifier lets visitors compare the published illustrative manifest without accessing customer records.
- The Public Assurance Register states material claims, implementation status, verification methods, evidence references, and limitations.
- Security, privacy, data handling, subprocessors, methodology, and the assurance boundary are published for review.
- AGICOMPLY does not claim certifications or approvals it has not earned. Customer statements are published only with explicit permission and within their approved scope.
One engagement, clearly scoped.
AGICOMPLY offers paid, fixed-scope evidence reviews and has completed its first paid engagement: a bounded review of an evidentiary paper and its signed export. We are building our customer history one scoped review at a time.
That engagement covered the paper and export mechanics. It did not validate the underlying business argument. We do not yet have a long customer history or a portfolio of public case studies. Prospective clients can review our sample, methodology, assurance boundaries, and written commercial terms before providing evidence.
Review the Founding Client ProgramI hired AGICOMPLY to review an evidentiary paper I was about to put in front of underwriters, and the signed export behind it. Mark found something every round. A citation I had attributed to the wrong venue, an export that named no verifier version, and a paper pointing readers at a mutable URL while its own bundle pinned an immutable one.
On the final pass he reproduced the signature, the checkpoint chain, 492 event inclusion proofs and 3 evaluation proofs offline, against a verifier he pinned and fetched himself. Then he declined to treat one checkpoint as anchored, because the file could not prove it. That refusal exposed a limitation of my own export format that nobody had named, and it was worth more to me than the pass.
He reviewed mechanics, and he was careful never to suggest he had validated anything beyond them. That precision is the product.
Ask the difficult question before you buy.
If a claim, boundary, method, or commercial term is unclear, Mark will answer it directly in writing. No anonymous sales handoff.